Anglophone group

Sometimes student thinking is loud: ideas collide, opinions clash, reasoning unfolds out loud.

Other times, it’s almost invisible, happening slowly, unevenly, or only for a few learners at once.

And sometimes what looks like engagement is really careful following.

These distinctions are easy to miss in the flow of teaching.

What, in your experience, seems to open space for students to think — and what, looking back, might quietly close that space without meaning to?

You could:

Lately, I’ve been sitting with a question that keeps resurfacing in very different classrooms and conversations.

It’s not a problem to solve, but more a noticing that gently changes how we see our teaching once it’s there. I’m curious what it stirs for you, in your own context.

Most lessons start with good intentions.

You ask a question.

You wait.

And when the silence stretches just a little too long, you step in — not because students can’t think, but because the lesson needs to move forward.

Why the distinction between Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and Lower-Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) transforms your teaching… and your assessments?

In our classrooms, all students “think.”

But how do they really think?

To design effective lessons, it is essential to understand two categories of cognitive processes: lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS).

LOWER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS (LOTS)

These involve foundational skills necessary to begin learning, but primarily show what the student can do with already known content.

Hi, I hope you had a relaxing weekend. I just read this post and thought it might interest you.

Before we teach something new, we need to awaken what students already know. That’s how real learning sticks — by connecting the known to the unknown.

When learners link new content to their own experiences, they don’t just memorize, they make meaning. Here are five simple yet powerful strategies that Kanupriya S. shared to help students activate prior knowledge and why they work.

KWL Charts — What I Know, What I Want to Know, What I Learned

• What it is: A graphic organizer that helps students outline what they already know, what they’re curious about, and what they learn by the end.

• Why it works: It gives students ownership of their learning journey and helps teachers see what background knowledge students bring into the lesson.

“I can always tell when authentic learning is happening. It’s not the neat rows of desks—it’s the sound. Students are debating, connecting, and building explanations without fear of being wrong.”

Thomas TJ McKenna, Educator

Isn’t this what we’re all striving for?

Authentic learning doesn’t sound like silence. It sounds like curiosity in action. As Thomas TJ McKenna puts it so beautifully, it’s in the debating, connecting, and explaining where real understanding is built.

What does authentic learning sound like in your classroom?

The Day I Threw Out My Lesson Plan

It was a rainy Tuesday, and I had planned the perfect lesson — slides, group work, and a hands-on task. I was ready. But the moment my students walked in, I could feel it: something was off. They were flat. One looked like she’d been crying. Another slammed his bag down and muttered something under his breath.

I paused. Took a breath. And then I said: “We’re not doing the plan today.”

Instead, we pushed the desks into a circle. I asked, “How’s everyone doing, really?”At first, silence. Then, one hand. Then two. Stories of pressure, exhaustion, a friendship fallout, and a sick parent. I listened. We all did.

That 45-minute conversation changed everything. The energy in the room shifted. When we finally returned to the unit later that week, they were more focused and kinder to one another.

I still believe in…

You know that moment when a student says, “Wait… this is like what we did in science!” — and suddenly, they’re making connections across subjects, ideas, even life outside school?

That’s transfer—and it’s one of the clearest signs that learning is going deeper.

But here’s the thing: transfer doesn’t just happen. It needs time. Space. Repetition. And the right conditions.

I’ve been exploring what sparks those “aha!” moments for students.

• Could it be the questions we ask?

• The examples we bring in?

Ever noticed how some students ace a quiz… but freeze when they have to apply that same knowledge in a new context?

Helping students transfer what they’ve learned from one topic or subject to another is one of the most powerful (and challenging!) parts of teaching. It’s not just about remembering facts—it’s about seeing the bigger picture, making connections, and thinking critically.

In my teaching, I’ve seen how real learning starts when students begin to connect the dots. That’s when engagement grows and confidence builds.

• Do your students struggle with transferring knowledge from one topic to another?

• How do you help them make meaningful connections?
  

Let’s share what works—and what we’re still figuring out. Your experience might be just the spark someone else needs!

Feedback is one of the most powerful tools we have as teachers. It helps students grow, reflect, and move forward in their learning. But its impact depends on how we use it.

What do you think? Is feedback mainly for:

a) Correcting mistakes

b) Fostering collaboration

c) Replacing assessments

d) Evaluating grades?

In many classrooms, teachers unintentionally take on the bulk of the cognitive load—planning, deciding, explaining, and solving problems for students. While this might feel like the best way to ensure everything runs smoothly, it often leads to disengagement and a lack of ownership from our students.

What if the key to deeper learning wasn’t in doing more for students, but in doing with them?

One simple strategy can change everything:

Track who’s doing the thinking.

Ask yourself:

• Who talks more—you or them?

Yesterday, during the workshop I gave on CLIL & Pluriliteracies in Spain, one of the teachers asked what backward design was.

I gave him the following example. Imagine you want your students to understand how different climate zones affect human activity. With backward design, you start with:

• What is the key undersranding I want my students to understand?

• Then you decide how will my students demonstrate their understanding? maybe by creating a presentation comparing how people live in two different climate zones.

• Only then do you plan the actual lessons—looking at maps, analyzing case studies, discussing adaptations. Everything is built around that final goal.

💥 And you? Do you use backward design in your planning? How does it work for you?

Hello, one theme that interests me in particular is how to engage my students in the activities that I offer. I find that sometimes, my students look like they are just going through the motions and are not particularly engaged. I try to tie what we learn to topics they care about and connect them to the "real world", but still I find it a struggle.