Freedom versus constraints in your classroom
Today I thought it would be interesting to talk about something that comes up a lot, but we don’t always name it directly.
How much freedom do you really have in your classroom?
We all know that teaching comes with a mix of responsibilities and constraints. But here’s the real question:
How much space do you have to teach your way, to adapt lessons, bring in your voice, and respond to your students’ needs?
And how much of your practice is shaped (or limited) by curriculum mandates, pacing guides, or school-wide consistency?
Some say teacher autonomy is essential for creativity, responsiveness, and joy.
Others argue that consistency ensures fairness for students and smoother collaboration across teams.
What do you think?
How much freedom do you have to shape your teaching?
A lot — I can adjust most things to fit my students
Some — I can make small tweaks within a set structure
Not much — most things are prescribed
It depends — varies by subject, school, or year
And if you’re up for it, share more in the comments.
What helps you feel trusted and empowered?
What gets in the way?
Have a wonderful weekend.
Thanks for sharing, Amna. It sounds like you’ve found a great balance between having the freedom to adapt your teaching and staying tuned in to what your students need. I love how adult learners can really express what works (and doesn’t!) for them. That kind of open dialogue can be so enriching.
I also think co-constructing learning is something we should be encouraging more at all levels, even with younger students. It helps them build ownership over their learning, develop critical thinking, and feel that their voice matters in the classroom. All this does wonders for their confidence and sense of responsibility.